Podcast: Play in new window | Download (Duration: 9:38 — 9.4MB)

Subscribe: Google Podcasts | Stitcher | TuneIn | RSS

Redefining marriage

Redefining marriage

I’m talking about marriage this time, but I’m coming at it from 3 very different angles.

What do state lines mean when it comes to recognizing certain marriages? According to one judge, not much.

Is it discrimination to not allow a guy to marry his computer? Even if he loves pornography more than real women? Sounds silly, until you hear how he makes his argument.

And while we’re throwing out the whole idea of man-woman marriage, why not throw out the whole monogamy thing as well? The New Republic makes the case.

Mentioned links:

FED. JUDGE RULES OHIO MUST FOLLOW OTHER STATES’ MARRIAGE LAWS INSTEAD OF ITS OWN

Florida man demands right to wed computer

It’s Time to Ditch Monogamy

Read the rest of this entry

Related posts:

  1. Episode 112: The Supreme Court Decrees Same-Sex Marriage to be the Law of the Land
  2. Episode 50: ObamaCare Proponents Want Exemptions, Capitalism Saving Detroit, and Judge Mandates Same-Sex Marriage in Ohio
  3. Episode 36: Marriage “Equality”, Obama Proclaims Fiscal Capability Month, and Another California City Goes Bankrupt
  4. Episode 48: State Attorney Generals are Not Judges, Tea Party “Terrorists”, and the George Zimmerman Trial
  5. Episode 47: A Look at the Supreme Court Rulings; Voting Rights Act, Defense of Marriage Act, and California’s Proposition 8